During Week 2 I have gained much valuable information on the following:
Firstly, I have learnt how to write the objective to a lesson in a new unusual to me way. I think that a teacher cannot come into the classroom without having a clear objective of the lesson: what to teach, what to expect from the students, and how to evaluate. In this respect Dr Bob Kizlik’s idea that “fuzzy thinking might get you through the day, but it will never get you through a career” (Kizlik, 2012) deserves my strongest support. Frankly speaking, I was taught to present objectives of a lesson in a bit different manner, but my personal opinion is that the one we used in the course is better and more laconic.
Secondly, I have found out and tried so many nice search engines from Choose the Best Search for Your Information Need. This experience is most useful for me because I am convinced that who possesses information, possesses the world. Following the threads of our discussions of Week 2 I tried my best to link practically to all the sites mentioned by my teacher and classmates. Some of these sites are really fascinating and provide interesting resources.
Thirdly, I have improved my skills on Internet search. The tips from “Technology Tip of the Month” (Healey, 2003) helped me greatly to make a proper query in the search engines I used and lessen the number of irrelevant hits.
And last but not least, I have communicated with my teachers and classmates and discussed some interesting issues. This experience was very engaging.
In addition, translating my reflections on the assignments of Week 2 into actions I have made some practical steps to integrate the gained knowledge into my teaching practice. For example, I prepared some activities for my students using the resources from the given list. On Friday I tried with my students the debate on the topic “Advertisements do more harm than good” from http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=717. We discussed advantages and disadvantages of advertising basing on the resource developed by Richard Penny (Finland). The debate was rather heated and my students liked it immensely.
Though I don't work with school children I found many interesting sites for my daughter. She is 6 and learns English. We added into Favourites the http://kids.yahoo.com/games, and http://learnenglishkids.britishcouncil.org/en/songs/pizza-and-chips. These interactive sites suggest many vocabulary and grammar games as well as videos. I have mentioned that I have no experience of teaching English to kids, that’s why only I “experiment” with my daughter. I see that when we work with a book, she is not interested much. But when we watch a cartoon or play a computer game she is more engaged in studying and remembers better.
I have added the tips on Internet search into my seminar materials on Information Search for Research on Linguistics.
So, in a whole I consider that this week was rather productive for me.
Hello, Victoria!
ReplyDeleteThank you for commenting on my Blog. Your comments made me want to visit your Blog to "meet" you and read your reflections. What you mention about your 6 year old daughter made me smile. Marc Prensky (2001)states that because today's students have grown up with technology, they think and process information fundamentally differently from their predecessors (in other words, us!). According to Prensky, your daughter is a Digital Native while we are Digital Immigrants.
You mention that you "experiment" with your daughter. This reminds me of Piaget who basically did the same! Perhaps one day, we'll be able to read about your findings! Keep up the good work, Victoria. We'll keep in touch.
Maria Luisa
Mexico